Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Spice Pinnacle Stylus Mi-550 Review

The ever-expanding screen sizes of smartphones have baffled some people, who want excellent viewing experience as well as comfort of holding. Pinnacle StylusMi-550 from Indian brand Spice finds the right balance of screen size and holding comfort. The USP is obvious in the name itself. The product comes with round headed stylus that makes taking notes a very easy task.  In my view, it's just elegant and sophisticated like Note 2. Let me reveal more on the product.


Aesthetics

The phone looks great with a massive display that utilizes the front real estate smartly. It looks much similar to Samsung Galaxy Note 2.  There is no physical button on the front panel; 3 capacitive buttons are given at the bottom side. Volume control on the left hand side; 3.5mm audio jack on the top; a microUSB port at the bottom; and power button on the right hand side. There is a thin silver colored bezel along the sides that adds to the visual appeal. The stylus can be inserted and pulled out as and when required from slot given at the bottom of the device. The back panel has a glossy white finish. An 8MP camera, dual-LED flash and speaker complete the back panel. The free flip cover that comes in the pack is extremely attractive. It fits very well to the device, giving access to all controls. Removing the back panel welcomes a 2500 mAh battery, 2 SIM card slots, and a microSD card slot.

Unboxing and Hands-on video

Camera, music and video

The 8MP camera records 1080p HD videos @30fps. In addition, it offers you various features like Self portrait, Geotagging, Face detection, Self timer, Zero shutter delay etc to customize and get desired pictures. There is a 2MP camera on the front panel for video chat. The pictures clicked using the front camera also looked great. No need to ask anyone to click your self portrait, you can get a good one using the Pinnacle Stylus front camera. I clicked a few indoor and outdoor pics using this camera. Really satisfied with the picture quality. The earbud type headset quality is good, not excellent though. The speakers delivered loud enough sound; even the quality of music is really good. It plays HD video.


Call and Data

Pinnacle Stylus showed consistent 3G data performance. Call quality seemed good with no call drop and voice cracking. The device does not have native 3G video call option, but you always can enjoy video calling via 3rd party applications like Skype and Gtalk.



Display

Trust me, the 5.5 inch display with HD (1280 x 720px) resolution is just amazing. The display shows vibrant colors. Images are crisp and sharp. The spaciousness of the screen also makes it really great for viewing Web pages and multimedia. The touchscreen is very responsive.

User interface

The onscreen QWERTY keyboard is good for typing. I have given it to a couple of friends who accurately typed a sentence with ease. I did not judge the keyboard myself because; I’m not really good in typing on mobile screens, no matter how good the keyboard is. The dialer is plain with no adornment. I personally like a bit colourful or button like look in place of simple digits on the dialer. You can easily access call logs and contacts from the dialer itself. Quick access to connectivity settings, display auto-rotation settings and brightness settings can be opened from the notification bar. The camera interface is neat and clean.

Processor and memory

The device comes with 1.2 GHz quad core processor that does seamless multi tasking. Memory specs encompass 8GB internal memory, 1GB RAM, and 32GB expansion via microSD card. 

Software and apps                                        

The handset ships with Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean) and comes with a number of Google's services, like Chrome, Gmail, Google Maps, Gtalk, and YouTube. Above all the Google Play store gives you an option to download a number of games and useful apps. Preloaded apps include NQ Mobile security, Ever Note, Opera Mini, News & Weather, and Hungama. Spice Note, an app from Spice, helps you take notes on your phone.

Connectivity

It offers all the standard connectivity options including dual-SIM, 2G/3G, Wi-Fi, USB, and GPS. The only option not given is NFC, which any way doesn’t affect much, as it is not used commonly in India now. It would be icing on the cake if Spice has given USB OTG feature as well; the first Pinnacle device Mi-530 featured it.

Battery

It comes with a 2500 mAh battery. The phone was alive for more than a day of average use – Did gaming, surfing, music playing and calling moderately.

Conclusion


The big yet gorgeous artefact, with its looks and performance, is expected to grab the market. A worth buy at a price of Rs 15499. I hope the price to satisfaction ratio will push its penetration in the market. Good job Spice!!!

Saturday, 12 October 2013

Lenovo P780 review

Lenovo P780 is going to give its buyers a most useful feature - which is the ability to function as a power bank, which none of the other handset offers. All you need to to is connect the phones using USB and OTG cable. The 4000 mAh colossal battery starts charging your friend's smartphone. You can simply reverse the cable connection to charge your phone using any other phone. I think this features would be somthing everyone wants to have; especially people who travels a lot.


I have written a review of Lenovo P780 on Saholic blog.

Pl read
Lenovo P780 review

Monday, 7 October 2013

Spice Stellar Virtuoso Pro+ Mi-492 Review

Guys.. Just wrote a review of Spice Stellar Virtuoso Pro+ Mi-492 on Saholic Blog.





Quick Specs

Display - 4.5 inch capacitive touchscreen, 854 x 480 px

Back camera - 5MP camera - Autofocus,  Night, Zoom, 720p HD video recording, LED flash

Front camera - 1.3MP front camera

Processor - 1.3 GHz Dual core processor

Memory - 4GB internal memory, 512MB RAM, 32GB expansion, 2GB Spice Cloud

Connectivity - 2G/3G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, USB, GPS/A-GPS

OS - Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)

Security features - Gesture screen lock, Remote lock, wipe & locate, Free antivirus

Battery - 1730 mAh battery

Entertainment - Music and Video player, FM radio


The device is a good option for Android beginners. Satisfied with the Camera and Music experience. Pl read the detailed review @ http://blog.saholic.com/stellar-virtuoso-pro-mi-492-review/




Monday, 1 July 2013

Sony Xperia Z Ultra Vs Samsung Galaxy Mega : Comparison of Phablets that Matter

There was a time when 5 inch mobile handsets were considered risky propositions because the trade pundits considered them to be a tad bigger for mobile phones.  Then came the Samsung GalaxyNote and the course of thinking changed, forever, perhaps.
Now, almost every handset maker has a phablet, bigger than 5 inches, in its repertoire to attract the buyer. And the size is going only one direction, upward. Today, in our comparison section we are going to give you a detailed comparison of two of the biggest and probably the best phablets in the world today :  Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 and SonyXperia Z Ultra.

Display and Build

The 6.3 inch SC-LCD display of the Galaxy Mega has a pixel resolution of  1280x720p where as the Xperia Z Ultra has a 6.4 inch display with a resolution of 1920x1080p. It is quite clear that the Xperia Z Ulta is not just bigger but better as well. And to add some more points, the Z Ultra is water and shatter proof. Z Ultra wins the first round.

Processor and RAM

The Galaxy Mega has a 1.7GHz dual core processor, which is complimented pretty well by a 1.5GB of RAM. There is no doubt that this combination sounds lethal but the appeal gets a little mellowed down when comes head to head with 2.2GHz quad core processor of Z Ultra, coupled with 2GB of RAM. Galaxy Mega does not stand a chance here.

Camera

The 8MP back camera of the Mega is capable of recording full 1080p HD videos; there is a 1.9MP front camera for video chat and self portrayal. In the Xperia handset, the camera section comprises of an 8MP back and a 2MP front camera, both the cameras can record full 1080p HD videos.  There is nothing much to chooses between the two prototypes, but in a comparison the Z Ultra will have a upper hand.

Storage

The Mega comes in two storage avatars: 8GB and 16GB; the onboard storage capacity of the device can be furthered till 64GB via microSD card. The Z Ultra has a 16GB built-in memory that can be extended till 64GB through a SD card. Both the handsets are on the same ground.

Connectivity and Battery

In the connectivity section Mega has 2G/3G/4G, Wi-Fi, USB, Bluetooth, and NFC; Xperia Z more or less has the same items on offer. Once again, no result.  The Mega shelters a 3200 mAh battery and the Z Ultra has a 3000 mAh battery. So no result, once more. 

There is no doubt that both the handsets are state of the art devices and neither one of them will disappoint you if you went with it. But, it is also clear that with better display, processor, RAM, and camera the Sony Xperia Z Ultra is a far superior handset than the Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3.   

You might also find yourself interested in:

Micromax Canvas HD A116 VS Samsung Galaxy Grand : Phablets in Comparison

Monday, 24 June 2013

Quad core – Does it really boost performance of a Smartphone?

Smartphone players have done much on the increasing screen size, loading advanced versions of operating system, reducing thickness of the device and so on. From last year beginning, the quad-core mania started. Instead of blindly counting on the theoretical benchmarks and expecting the device to perform more swiftly than the dual-core device, it is always better to understand other factors that actually affect the device performance in real-life tasks.

Theoretically multi-core can be compared to room with multiple doors. When too many people gathered in the room are asked to leave the room simultaneously, a 4 door room can be emptied easily compared to a 2 door room. Besides the fast processing, quad-core chips also promise better battery life. This is because, a single core has to work hard to complete a task on its own, while multiple cores does the same work with more ease, depleting the battery slower.


Theory is just theory. There are many factors that actually affect the processing speed.

Requirement for operating system support

No matter how many cores are there in the processor, there is nothing much it can do without the help of software. There should be software to divide a particular task and assign to each core a portion of the task. Technically this is called “Multithreading” and this process can be done only with the help of software. So it is important to have a software that supports multithreading.

Lack of multithread execution in apps and games

Suppose you have a multi-cored device loaded with multithreading supported software. But what if the apps or games are not coded to support multithreaded execution? It is highly complicated for developers to write codes or debug apps and games to support such execution.

Limitations in video streaming

The most demanding applications that should ideally get benefited from multiple cores are gaming and videos. When threaded games are not being developed, streaming videos from various online sources also is not getting benefitted from multi-cores. The reason is that the videos steams cannot be easily broken up. So they end up being processed using a single core; other cores may be either idle or being used for less demanding tasks such as email.

Memory bottlenecks

Apps processing can be divided into multiple cores. But the multiple cores are still using shared memory space; that means there is no dedicated memory assigned to each core. In some cases, the memory architecture can also become a bottleneck.  A single channel memory architecture reduces the data transfer rate between the memory and chipset, compared to a dual channel memory.

Battery life myth

“More cores means less power” theory is not always right. It all depends on how intelligently the software is able to do the optimization to minimize the energy consumption. The energy efficiency is improved only when more demanding tasks are being carried out. But most of the time, multiple cores are being used for less demanding tasks, ultimately increasing the energy utilization.


To conclude: Performance is not just connected to number of cores, but tied to an optimized ecosystem of hardware and software.